In New York Post, James Lileks complains about City Pages' coverage of Michele Bachmann

f_james_lileks.jpg
James Lileks has a beef with Blotter.
In a New York Post article published today, Star Tribune columnist James Lileks complains about Blotter's dogged coverage of Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

The column for the Murdoch-owned paper is an attempt by Lileks to explain Minnesota politics, and Bachmann in particular, to a skeptical nation.

Along the way, Lileks--known for his bizarre transformation from genial City Pages columnist into xenophobic conservative apologist-- fires a shot across our bow.

Here's Lileks's not-so-subtle allusion to Blotter's recent Bachmann coverage:

A local blog, devoted entirely to collecting every atom of Bachmannphobia on the planet went a step further, and Photoshopped her face on some hideous quasi-human creature with deformed infants suckling at its teats. That was a mild day for them.
While it's true City Pages has been far more aggressive in covering Bachmann's rise to national prominence than Lileks's local employer, the Star Tribune, we have to take issue with his description of our recent post about Bachmann's strange crusade against tax breaks for breastfeeding mothers.
mbBreast-Pump.jpg
This is the picture that James Lileks attacked in the New York Post.
In bashing the first lady's idea as "nanny state" politics, Bachmann bragged that she had breastfed all five of her children without government help.

"I've given birth to five babies and I breastfed every single one," Bachmann said. "To think that government has to go out and buy my breast pump.... That's the new definition of a nanny state."
To illustrate the story, we simply photoshopped a picture of Bachmann from her recent State of the Union response onto a picture of a woman using a breast pump. After all, this was the item at the center of the debate and Bachmann's own contention that if she could breastfeed five babies without government help, no one else needs it either.

Contrary to Lileks's florid description, the "deformed infants suckling at its teats" is actually a regular infant suckling at its regular mother's breast, a normal human activity that Michelle Obama is trying to encourage and that Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, and other conservatives are trying to politicize.

Now that's sick!

More Michele Bachmann Coverage:


 

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy
Sign up for free stuff, news info & more!

Tools

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy