Bachmann, Pawlenty leading in Iowa, according to laughable poll

Thumbnail image for bachmann pawlenty 2shot.jpg
Bachmann is first in a lot of polls, and Pawlenty's rooting for fifth.
That Michele Bachmann has made a swift, terrifying rise to the top of the Republican candidate pool is not in dispute.

But Tim Pawlenty finishing second in a new poll of Iowa voters should be stunning to everyone, including his spokesman. Pawlenty's been running so poorly in recent polls that his campaign is lowering expectations for the all-important Aug. 13 Ames, Ia. straw poll.

"We want to show progress in Ames," Pawlenty spokesman Alex Conant told the Natonal Journal, "better than sixth or seventh."

Sixth or seventh? For the two-term governor of a neighboring state, a guy who's basically lived in Iowa since 2006, finishing in fifth place would be "progress"?

But things are looking up. This phony new poll is out, an Iowa voter called him "the incarnation of President Bush," and Pawlenty's getting bullied by Mickey Mouse. He'll probably be president by the end of August.

The poll that shows Pawlenty running in a distant second place to Bachmann comes from The Conservative Journal, an otherwise obscure political blog.

In their latest survey, Bachmann dominates all comers with 33 percent of the vote. Then comes the shocker, with Pawlenty's 13 percent support putting him just above Mitt Romney, who's at 12 percent.

Thumbnail image for pawlenty incarnation bush.jpg
That's not a good phrase to have underneath your face.
In all other polls, Bachmann and Romney had been running neck and neck for first place, while Pawlenty was gradually descending toward 0 percent. The explanation for Pawlenty's sudden rise might be found in The Conservative Journal's site, where TCJ Research is described as "a very loose arm of The Conservative Journal," which is a website no one's heard of.


"Our polls are conducted by a great friend of mine who operates a market research firm and agreed to do our polls under the condition that we leave his company name out of the equation so clients aren't influenced by the fact that he conducts polls for a conservative website. It's a stipulation that, while inconvenient, we're more than willing to live with in exchange for quality polls. We know we'll probably never be taken 100% seriously until we can be 100% transparent (which we understand), but until then, those of us who don't live to doubt can enjoy the fun!"
Oh, what fun Tim Pawlenty's been having these days!

Earlier this week, Conant, his spokesman, told the National Journal that anything fifth place or better in the Ames straw poll would be great news. This was probably due to the fact that in most polls Pawlenty's losing to Sarah Palin and Rick Perry, who aren't actually running.

Then, an Iowa voter confronted Pawlenty on whether he'd pass balanced budgets as president. When Pawlenty hedged, the man described him as "an incarnation of George Bush," who was literally the most unpopular president of all time when he left office.

Don't worry, Tim, next week will probably be better. It couldn't possible be worse.

Previously:



Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Sparky
Sparky

That Mikey might disagree with the poll does not make it laughable.  There are at least three national polls that put BHO 7-12 points behind "any Republican".  Lots of time before Nov 2012.  Relax.

Kirk the Conservative Jerk
Kirk the Conservative Jerk

Is this the same "laughable poll" that had Mark Dayton up by 10 points, a day or so, before the election?

green23
green23

I looked it up, Kirk. That pollster you keep howling about was St. Cloud State University. SCSU isn't a national pollster. They aren't even ranked.Please, keep bringing this poll up every time a poll is mentioned. I enjoy humiliating you with facts.

Since you are a bit slow grasping concepts, I'll spell it out for you: every time that you ask "Is this the same pollster that...", the answer will be "No". That will be followed by, "I told you that already. You already knew the answer before you asked."

Are we clear, genius?

green23
green23

Did you read the article, Kirk? And the poll is laughable because it doesn't give any of the information that is needed to evaluate it: sample size, crosstabs, PID, question wording, likely/registered/adult, MOE, etc.Basically, this outfit is saying, "We're conservative, so just trust us".

There are crappy pollsters out there, just like there are crappy auto mechanics, writers, drivers, cooks, and salesmen. That doesn't mean that all pollsters are crappy. Usually, sane and reasonable people examine the things that I mentioned above and look at the track record of the pollster. We can't do any of that with this poll, so it's worthless.

Your logic, as usual, is ridiculous. Apparently what you are saying is that because some pollster that you can't even name did a lousy job in the gubernatorial race, we should believe this completely mysterious pollster. Or disregard polling altogether, unless it agrees with your views.

Apparently you skipped over the parts of the post where it was explained that no other pollster, conservative or otherwise, is seeing these results for Pawlenty. That would give a sane and reasonable person pause, and the word "outlier" might come to mind. Interesting that this did not occur to you.

Here's an idea: why don't you look up the name of the pollster that showed Dayton ahead by 10 points? Then you will know not to trust that particular pollster's work, instead of blaming every other pollster for someone else's work.

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...