Michele Bachmann cancels Iowa events to vote against debt ceiling plan

bachmann c span.jpg
Bachmann's vote is the only thing standing between the U.S. and sanity.
Don't fear, America, Michele Bachmann is racing back to Washington to bravely vote against the debt ceiling plan that would save America's credit rating and stock markets worldwide.

America's gain is Iowa's loss: Bachmann announced this morning that she probably won't make it to events today in the towns of Newton and Dexter to play congresswoman for the day. The last-minute deal cooked up by Barack Obama and Republicans in the House and Senate to raise the debt ceiling is apparently too important, and Michele must skip out on the good people of Dexter, Iowa, to vote against it.

Bachmann released a statement rejecting the plan just after Obama announced it last night.

"Someone has to say no," Bachmann said. "I will."

Bachmann's also still banking on her extreme position on the debt ceiling to raise money with "emergency contributions" to her campaign.

Obama presented an outline of the deal in a surprise announcement last night, explaining that "the leaders of both parties, in both chambers, have reached an agreement that will reduce the deficit and avoid default -- a default that would have had a devastating effect on our economy."

bachmann eyes obama.jpg
If you could only choose one of these people to trust, who would it be?
Bachmann's statement blames President Obama for the impending crisis, and essentially cuts out Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. To Bachmann, this plan is Obama's and Obama's alone.

"Mr. President, I'm not sure what voice you're listening to, but I can assure you that the voice of the American people wasn't the 'voice that compelled Washington to act.' It was you that got us into this mess, and it was you who wanted a $2.4 trillion dollar blank check to get you through the election. Everywhere I travel across the country, Americans want less spending, lower taxes to create jobs, and they don't want us to raise the debt ceiling.

"The president continues to press for a 'balanced approach,' which everyone knows is code for increased spending and taxes. Throughout this process the president has failed to lead and failed to provide a plan. The 'deal' he announced spends too much and doesn't cut enough. This isn't the deal the American people 'preferred' either, Mr. President. Someone has to say no. I will."
Maybe the only new thing about this debt ceiling debate is that it's the first one since Michele Bachmann was running for president. The American debt ceiling has been raised 106 times by congressional vote since 1940 -- including 18 under Ronald Reagan, 7 under George W. Bush, and three already under Obama -- according to Politifact.

Yesterday, Bachmann supporters got an email reiterating that she wouldn't vote to raise the debt ceiling... and reminding them of the email she sent on Thursday last week, which asked for money.

"That's why I'm writing you today -- I need to know you agree with me that we simply cannot afford to raise the debt ceiling. Will you help me deliver this message loud and clear by making an emergency contribution of $25, $50, $100, $250 or any amount up to the $2,500 limit?"
See, America? The debt ceiling isn't something you need to worry about. The real emergency is how much money you can give to Michele Bachmann's campaign.

Since announcing her bid for president, Bachmann's missed almost 40 percent of the votes in Congress, The Hill reported last week. But this time, her country needs her. Won't you help buy her a plane ticket?

Previously:



My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
amfowler
amfowler

This article is very one sided. That is what sucks about press these days. Its hard to believe a writer like this because he/she is so emotionally involved they skew the facts. I have a question for the author of this article. Suppose Bachmann stayed in Iowa and didn't go back to vote. Would you tear her apart for that decision too? Suppose you, the author, really read the bill that Michelle Bachmann flew back to read and vote on. Maybe then you could present  more facts instead of biases. I don't know about the rest of the readers but the article was a waste of my time.p.s. Am I the only one who read this article and wondered if the author knows the difference between 20 bucks and 2.4 trillion? Obama asked for a 2.4 Trillion dollar blank check for his campaign. 

vitajex
vitajex

Yes, Michele, you're right!  The president has agreed to a deal that does not raise taxes by one penny, cuts entitlement programs by trillions- TRILLIONS!- of dollars and still protects your favorite "investors"; oil companies, large corporations, health insurance "providers", etc.  But that's still not enough.

Make no mistake, people.  This agreement signals the end of the middle class in America.  The very rich and corporate interests have protected their interests and made it nearly impossible for anyone else to live their lives with anything approaching comfort after they must--provide COMPLETELY for their own old age.  The social safety net has holes that are getting bigger every day.  Social Security?  Medicaid?  Under 40?  FORGET IT- NOT FOR YOU!-provide COMPLETELY for their own children's education.  You can't send them to public schools because they'll be in a classroom with 50 other students and a teacher who's either brand new and just getting enough experience to get in at a private school, or underqualified to get a higher-paying job as a housekeeper in a luxury hotel.  You want them to go to college?  Better have a cool $250,000 saved up!  And don't ask for low-interest government-backed loans, you deadbeat!-provide COMPLETELY for their own healthcare.  Republicans have done a great job scaring the American public into thinking that "Obamacare" has cost America trillions of dollars and not saved anyone.  Of course, they conveniently omit that almost NONE of the pieces of the plan have even BEGUN yet.  And insurance costs just keep rising for less and less coverage.

Now combine this with the increases in productivity and the decreases in employment?  We've got most Americans working harder, for less money, with less government support, less social welfare, less infrastructure investment, less, less, LESS.

In other words, this land is now THEIR land.

Kirk the Conservative Jerk
Kirk the Conservative Jerk

Ahhh consistency! 

Unlike EVERY democrat who voted AGAINST raising the debt ceiling in 2006.

Well, I was against it before I was for it....

Guy
Guy

 What one person calls flip-flopping another person might call flexibility. And 2006 most certainly was not 2011, so it isn't the same vote. What you choose to call consistency, I call stubbornness. It all depends on where you're coming from.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...