Vikings stadium bill: Representatives 'pull rabbit out of hat,' proposal advances to full Senate

vikings bill celebration.jpg
Star Tribune video screengrab
Vikings rubes celebrate in the Capitol after last night's vote.
On April 16, the Vikings stadium bill seemed to die an anticlimactic death in the House Government Operations and Elections Committee, which seemingly killed it with a 9-6 vote.

Afterward, the chief author of the House bill, Rep. Morrie Lanning, R-Moorhead, said it would require someone to "pull a rabbit out of a hat for this thing to stay alive." Apparently one of our legislators should consider working as a magician when the legislature isn't in session.

Last night, in a move that would make David Copperfield proud, the Vikings stadium bill was approved by the House with a 73-to-58 vote. Prior to the vote, a number of amendments were passed, the most major upping the team's share of the project cost from $427 million to $532 million.

Vikes spokesman Lester Bagley said making the team pay more "isn't workable," but didn't indicate the team would reject the whole proposal should the Senate decide to keep the Vikings-pay-more provision.

Speaking of the Senate, legislators in that chamber might debate the stadium bill as soon as today. And despite yesterday's result, it's no foregone conclusion that the bill will survive the legislature's upper chamber.
The Senate could vote on the bill as soon as today.

As Politics in Minnesota notes, "the bill now faces what is likely to be a tougher vote in the Minnesota Senate, where political observers [say] the right-wing contingent in the caucus is more organized and openly hostile toward the stadium proposal." If senators approve the bill, then a conference committee will address any differences between the House and Senate versions. It would then be sent to legislators for one more round of floor votes before reaching the desk of Gov. Mark Dayton, who is sure to sign the bill into law.

Yesterday's debate followed mostly predictable lines. Rep. Mary Franson, R-Alexandria and one of our favorites, spoke in opposition of using a gambling expansion to pay for the state's portion of the stadium, saying that doing so means "it becomes the stadium that losers built."

But Rep. Tom Anzelc, D-Balsam Township, told Franson and other gambling opponents to "get over it," saying that Minnesotans "want to participate in games of chance that are fair, that are legal and have a purpose."
pat garofalo crop.jpg
Garofalo may have saved taxpayers a cool $100 million.

The amendment requiring the team to pay more was introduced by Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington. Whereas the original bill gave all naming rights proceeds to the Vikings, Garofalo's proposal would split naming rights income between the team and state. Another approved amendment would give the state up to 25 percent of the sale price if Zygi Wilf decides to sell the team.

Gov. Mark Dayton predicted last week that the bill would pass with a 68-to-65 vote in the House. In the end, the larger-than-expected margin was largely attributable to more DFLers than expected voting in favor. As blogger Nick Coleman notes: Rep. Paul Marquart, D-Dilworth, seemed to capture the way many pro-stadium legislators feel about the bill when he said "Whether or not we waited two years or three years or five years or 10 years, there never will be a perfect plan in a perfect political climate."

A dash of caution for those of you who spent last night dreaming about a purple and gold-clad Christian Ponder throwing interceptions touchdowns in Best Buy General Mills stadium -- if the bill fails in the Senate, it wouldn't be the first time a Vikings stadium bill passed one chamber but died in the other. As the Pioneer Press notes, in 2006, a Vikings stadium bill was approved by the Senate but not by the House.

Related coverage:
-- House Speaker Kurt Zellers wants Vikings stadium bill to pass... but won't vote for it?
-- Dayton: Vikings stadium bill needs to be approved this session, or it's too late
-- Stadium bill deader than Vikings' postseason chances, but Dayton hopeful for another shot
-- Majority of Minneapolis City Council now supports Vikings stadium
-- Vikings, Rybak, Dayton, pro-Vikes legislators finally unveil stadium plan

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

 This whole thing is a sham.  Minneapolis and Minnesota are being fleeced because they're afraid to lose "their" football team.


Have to disagree with Nick Coleman on this one. Democrats won't get th blame if hte public approves of it, and it's amazing how a realistic possibility of losing the franchise has had a bracing effect on public opinion. Maybe it was all the instances of a team moving when the public balked on paying part of the cost for a new facility or renovations of an existing one, and later paid the whole cost for an even more expensive facility. We did it too with Xcel Center, so seems safe to assume it the stadium doesn't pass now, the Viking s will leave, and we'll pay twice as much to attract another team.


"Christian Ponder throwing interceptions touchdowns in Best Buy General Mills stadium"


Get it done. Suck it up Minnesota!


Let the ViQueens GO.. They are cursed, and they are useless. I'd rather have a new team with a great name like the "wild".  LOL


And don't forget that attracting another team isn't easy in the NFL. It took Baltimore 13 years to get another team after the Colts left. Many cities have been waiting patiently for decades and still have never had a team. If people like sports or not, we are lucky to have all major sports here, and losing the most popular of those wouldn't be good.  

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault