Amy Senser's convictions upheld; she'll be sentenced July 9, then appeal

Categories: Law
senser and nelson.jpg
Senser and defense attorney Eric Nelson leave the courthouse after Judge Mabley refused to throw out her felony convictions.
Amy Senser's last chance to avoid prison time slipped away yesterday when Hennepin County Judge Daniel Mabley denied her motion for acquittal or a new trial.

Two weeks ago, Eric Nelson, Senser's defense attorney, filed a motion making a case that jurors were confused about their instructions, and rendered their guilty verdict based on an incorrect understanding of criminal vehicular homicide law. At the heart of Nelson's case was a note jurors sent to Judge Mabley just before the verdict was read on May 3. It said, "We believe, [Senser] believed she hit a car or vehicle and not a person," and jurors asked Mabley to read the note in court -- a request he declined to fulfill.

In his motion, Nelson argued that hitting a vehicle "is simply not the offense [Senser] was charged with" and asked that the conviction be thrown out. But in denying Nelson's request, Judge Mabley characterized the note as "a complete non-issue."

During yesterday's hearing, Nelson had some pointed language for Judge Mabley, saying "the difficulty I have in speaking to Your Honor is, Judge, I think you made a mistake... I think you kind of blew it" in refusing to read the note in court.

But Mabley, in his rejection of Nelson's motion, wrote that the note "did not contain a substantive question, but rather a request for the judge to explain the underlying reasons for the verdict."

Mabley characterized the note as simply providing insight into the jury's thinking, and noted that deliberations are strictly confidential.
senser upset.jpg
Joe Senser, shown here getting upset with photogs during his wife's trial, was also visibly angered by yesterday's ruling.

"Thus, a note which discloses the jury's reasoning or thought process should not be considered," he wrote. "Further, the information in the note did not impeach the verdict. In fact, it demonstrated that the jury properly applied the law in reaching its verdicts."

The Pioneer Press notes that Mabley's ruling didn't sit well with Senser's husband, former Viking and restauranteur Joe Senser. He was visibly angry after the hearing and could be overheard uttering the word "liar" to nobody in particular as he stormed out of the courtroom.

The upshot of all this is that Amy Senser will face the music during her July 9 sentencing. Her felony convictions for failure to stop and failure to notify authorities call for a prison sentence of four years under state guidelines.

Nelson will still have the opportunity to appeal Senser's convictions -- he's already vowed to do so -- but it'll have to wait until after she's sentenced next month.

Previous coverage of the Amy Senser trial:
-- Amy Senser jury may have been confused; defense wants convictions overturned
-- Amy Senser found guilty of two felonies, not guilty of gross negligence
-- Joe Senser loses cool, tells photographers to "get a life"
-- Joe Senser on "Amyworld": Flaking out on picking up kids reflects her 'fierce independence'

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
Who's the liar
Who's the liar

Who's the liar Joe.  Think back to between the time Margaret was hired as a waitress by your restaurant and your divorce- any deception there.    Was it Margaret refusing to come forward, using your daughters to create reasonable doubt- real nice to put you in the position of having to choose.   Is she fooling around- i know you never asked and never caught her but is she.  What about this oxygen deprived space cadet character in Amyworld you created.  Your younger daughter created a different version of Amyworld and refuted what you said- who is lying Joe. " I don't know, i didn't ask, i don't want to know, i gave it away, it was in the pocket i gave away. etc etc".  You are all liars.

How about your lawyer and his great strategy- did he make any promises.  Is he a liar.  I will get it tossed on appeal- did his strategy and promise work out.

How does it feel to know that had you called the police the next morning, the alcohol if any would have left the system, and there would likely be no charges.  How does it feel having the dirty laundry and dysfunctionality of your family situation aired in public- we didn't even get to hear the history of alcohol use or the potential witnesses listed at the beginning with drunk driving convictions- probably irrelevant given the charges but would have been interesting.  Your business is going and perhaps soon gone, media jobs gone, daughters friends going or gone, you and Margaret are despised.  I don't think anyone is jealous of you or your situation as your few supporters suggest.  Since you didn't do it i kind of feel sorry for you but that goes away when i see your missplaced anger whether it be civil attornies or media camera men.

How does this reconcile with your religous beliefs and what you say in your youtube videos.  Do you have any regrets.

It does look like your 2 older daughters do seem to care about you and they are the only ones who have acted decently through this.  I think this is a classic case study to prove the point its better to tell the truth and hopefully the judge can use this case to deter others from going down the same path.     



A man is *dead*, and this family is still storming around throwing tantrums because they can't get off on a technicality.

Really gives a good insight into the moral depth and sense of privilege these people have.

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault