Sen. Marty and Rep. Hausman plan to introduce marriage equality bill early this session

marty hausman.jpeg
Marty (left) and Hausman (right) want to legalize gay marriage as soon as possible.
In the wake of last month's defeat of the marriage amendment, DFL leaders seem less than enthusiastic about getting a marriage equality bill passed this session. Senate Majority Leader-elect Tom Bakk, for instance, says he wants his caucus to focus on economic issues, not divisive social ones, when it convenes next month.

SEE ALSO: DFL leaders "won't pass a bill legalizing" gay marriage this session... or will they?

But soon, ready or not, legislators may have to put their cards on the table when it comes to the marriage issue. According to a report from ECM Publishers, Sen. John Marty, D-Roseville, and Rep. Alice Hausman, D-St. Paul, plan to introduce a bill legalizing same-sex marriage in the early days of the upcoming legislative session.

From ECM's T.W. Budig:
"To me, I think the time has come," said Marty, who has sponsored same-sex marriage bills in the past.

Hausman and Marty argue passage of same-sex marriage legislation needn't be time consuming nor distract from the mission of setting the state budget.

Marty speaks of a two-hour debate in the Senate Judiciary Committee and an up or down vote.

Hausman is a bit more cautious, saying the number of committees a same-sex marriage bill might need to clear in the House depends on its legal implications and the desire of House leadership.

But she also looks to passing a bill before the final state budget numbers come out in the forecast.
In the report, House Minority Leader-elect, Kurt Daudt, R-Crown, preemptively dings Dems like Marty and Hausman for alleged hypocrisy.

"What the DFL's message [in the election] was, is that we shouldn't be focused on divisive social issues," Daudt told ECM. "It's interesting how roles have switched."

Daudt can ding Dems all he wants, but with DFL majorities in both chambers and Gov. Dayton on the record saying he'll sign a marriage equality bill, there's not much the MNGOP can do to stop it from becoming law. So here's the key question: Do DFL legislators have the political will to make it happen this session?

My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Brian McClellan
Brian McClellan

Nothing like starting the next legislative session with a "divisive social issues" just like MNGOP did last session with anti-abortion bills. While I support Marty and Hausman's intent and do not support their timing. Deal with the economic issues first, complete the state budget work long before the end of the session (or in a special session,) and then deal with "divisive social issues."

webcelt
webcelt

The voters didn't oppose the marriage amendment because they didn't think the legislature should have worked on social issues. They voted no because they opposed taking rights away. It's time to take the ban out of statutory law too. If two adults want to get married, it's nobody else's business.

swmnguy
swmnguy topcommenter

Good.  Why the heck not?  It's too bad that some people consider extending rights to people, acknowledging the reality that people are already living in our communities, and making our society more fair to all of us to be "divisive."  I don't blame Rep. Daudt personally for his statement; he's representing the view of too many people who think that way.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...