ACLU opposes new law allowing state to keep newborn blood samples

SmilingBaby.jpg
A bill signed into law earlier this week by Gov. Mark Dayton allows the health department to collect and store blood samples taken from newborn babies for an indefinite period of time, unless parents opt-out of the program.

And that's the problem, ACLU-MN Executive Director Chuck Samuelson argues. People shouldn't have to opt-out -- instead, they should opt-in.

See also:
Abbott Hospital gave newborn to wrong mom, who breastfed baby before mixup was noticed

"In government and corporate setups where people have to opt-out of the collection of data, we believe they should opt-in," Samuelson tells us.

The law is meant as a public health measure. (You can read the bill for yourself here.) Blood samples are used to check for more than 50 rare genetic disorders, some of which are potentially fatal but can be treated easily if identified early. Later on, samples are used for medical research.

Samuelson supports those efforts, but argues the burden should be on the state to persuade people that handing over a baby's blood sample is a good thing to do.

"There's a huge problem with [doctors and state officials] not being articulate with parents about how important it is that these samples be kept and used in various research programs to improve the health of all children," he says. "You can see how we would make the argument. Personally, I've got no problem with it -- keep it and do [the research], that's how you make life better, and if you don't want to participate in screening and there's consequences, then that's your problem."

"It's the same way I feel feel about motorcycle helmets," Samuelson continues. "You can ride without a helmet, but if you're in an accident and your noggin gets split open, your insurance company shouldn't be on the hook."

The new law comes in response to a 2011 Minnesota Supreme Court decision that threw out a previous state program under which the Department of Health simply kept newborn blood samples, no questions asked.

While the ACLU takes issue with the new law, Samuelson says Minnesota's blood sample collection system still compares favorably with what goes on in many other states.

"Most other states to be brutally honest try to limit parental choice, and I think bluntly they're missing a huge learning opportunity," he says. "Fundamentally the way you stop [the spread of false beliefs about the dangers of vaccines, for instance] is you talk to kids when they are at the very beginning of life and explain it to them -- we should as a society think about this as a long-term issue, and within society we need to have privacy and need to get government off our back but also acknowledge we aren't solo actors floating through life."

"We need to talk about the need for babies to be tested, for research to be done on those samples so we can discover new cures for disease and new vaccines and all that stuff, but in a first world country, I think that's possible without cramming it down peoples' throats," Samuelson adds.

-- Follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter at @atrupar. Got a tip? Drop him a line at arupar@citypages.com.


My Voice Nation Help
16 comments
Daren L. MN
Daren L. MN

The Eugenics Wars begin. In Star Trek it was late 90s but they weren't that far off - how long before the SS Botany Bay leaves orbit?

Sara Schieve
Sara Schieve

If they want my dna they just have to ask, and have very deep pockets. No state should have such control over life of any kind. At this rate we will only be allowed to get pregnant with Monsanto engineered sperm. Life gets more like a bad sci-fi flick written by nazis everyday.

Bil Thorne
Bil Thorne

If these kids didn't want me to get their DNA and clone them maybe they shouldn't have chosen to be born in the first place.

Truth_Teller_1
Truth_Teller_1 topcommenter

If they did that for all the N. Mpls babies - then we would have a good DNA crime database!

Sarah Lawl
Sarah Lawl

Are you all really surprised? Look up Helen Lacks aka HeLa cells. Any and every tissue/sample that they take from you is used for research... and your cells are multiplied and used again and again. They are sold for profit to anyone who wants to buy them for research purposes. We all are a part of ongoing medical research. They don't call it medical practice for no reason.

clompthestrong
clompthestrong

@KenzoShibata why against it? Anyone can opt out and it presents a clear public health interest. And obviously single payer would be nice

digitalprotocol
digitalprotocol topcommenter

ya, the old fucks want the baby blood to stave off aging

joshwarren1984
joshwarren1984

@atrupar Woot at it again, denying us rights over our own bodies. Almost puts him in the same circle as the pro-lifers.

KenzoShibata
KenzoShibata

@clompthestrong There's no reason for the State to keep these records unless the State provides public health care. Cart before the horse.

clompthestrong
clompthestrong

@KenzoShibata but the state already collects info about vaccinations and tb tests, I guess I don't see how this is different

clompthestrong
clompthestrong

@KenzoShibata I follow, I just Didn't see it as much different than what is a already done. Not a huge deal to me either

KenzoShibata
KenzoShibata

@clompthestrong ... diagnose problems if they aren't prepared to fix them. They want our data, we should get something in return.

KenzoShibata
KenzoShibata

@clompthestrong Honestly, this isn't an issue I'm all that passionate about either way, but I don't feel there's a need for the state to...

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...