Supreme Court ruling on cell phone privacy is "really big deal," ACLU's Samuelson says

Categories: Law
All these folks agree officers need a warrant to search your cell phone.
This week, in a rare unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement agencies must obtain a warrant before searching cell phones.

The ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, says that just because smartphones now allow people to carry vast quantities of their personal information around with them "does not make the information any less worthy of the protection for which the founders fought."

See also:
MN ACLU explains why Duck Dynasty dude's anti-gay comments aren't protected speech

The ruling was applauded by ACLU Minnesota Executive Director Chuck Samuelson, who characterizes it as "a huge ruling -- this is a really big deal."

Samuelson says the SCOTUS ruling, along with a bill signed into law this year in Minnesota that requires officers to obtain a warrant before they can track the location of a suspect's phone, represent victories for people like himself who believe "we have a constitutional provision that requires the police to say why they're searching you."

"It's about stopping fishing expeditions," Samuelson tells us. "The NSA is engaging in a giant fishing expedition on everybody to find out what crimes have been committed, but that's bass awkwards."

"In the U.S. you have to commit a crime before police get involved to find out what crime and who did it," he adds. "In the NSA world, they track everybody, find out what everybody is guilty of, and then decide if they're going to prosecute or not. This was an attempt by the court to restore some balance from the civil liberties point of view."

Samuelson notes, however, that "police and NSA can still search your phone without a warrant -- they just cannot use it against you" in court. And it's not as though judges usually make it very difficult for officers to obtain warrants in the first place.

"Every police jurisdiction has a number of friendly judges where you just call them up and get a warrant," Samuelson says. "You sit by the side of the road, email them and you get a warrant. Bingo, it's done."

It's also important for people to know their rights in case you find yourself on the wrong side of the law, Samuelson says.

(For more, click to page two.)

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

   I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I've ever had. I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life. For more info visit my user name link.......................




muhutdafuga topcommenter

Speaking of overreach, where does the "Fascist 5" get their authority to rule on constitutionality?  Give me the exact wording from the constitution.

Where did the "Band of Idiots" get the authority to appoint the worst president since reagan?

k2yeb topcommenter

Losing more cases than winning it seems. The lack of oversight on a federal level is clearly the cause. 

Jake Wood
Jake Wood

if those old freaks can even figure out how to use a phone LOL you all know you ROFL'ed at that!! (old people and technology lmao my ass off!)

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault