Is seeing My Bloody Valentine live worth the hearing damage?

MBVRoyHeader.jpg

In 1991, My Bloody Valentine transfixed shoegaze fans with the masterpiece Loveless, but then retreated into the hazy shadows before eventually dropping off the musical map altogether. The prolonged wait for a follow-up finally came to an end earlier this year with their third full-length, m b v. Opinions on the new material varied from proclamations of another MBV masterstroke to queries of why the band even bothered. Regardless, we're talking about My Bloody Valentine's legacy once again.

Now, the Dublin quartet have just announced plans for a full-scale U.S. tour, including a highly anticipated local show at Roy Wilkins Auditorium in St. Paul in November, which prompted Gimme Noise to analyze if MBV's thunderous sonic assault to your eardrums (and wallet) will ultimately be worth it, or if this is nostalgia simply getting the best of us.

See Also: My Bloody Valentine's comeback, mbv, wasn't worth the loveless wait

Wake me up when Ride announces a reunion show

Some fans question whether My Bloody Valentine even qualifies as the best band to emerge out of the shoegaze scene, and argue that Loveless has had undue praise heaped upon it. Ride's seminal debut, Nowhere, actually preceded Loveless by over a year, and many feel that it is more inspired and a far better representative of the shoegaze movement. It's a good time to revisit Ride, Curve, Swervedriver, Lush, and many others getting some well-deserved new fans out of MBV's current resurgence, but until these bands reform and/or play in the Twin Cities, this is all we've got.


Why not just go see Savages instead?

Some say My Bloody Valentine are musical dinosaurs who had their chance in the early '90s, and they should now just step aside and let modern bands have their moment. An easy example is Savages, who return to Minneapolis on Tuesday for a show at First Avenue less than two months after devastating the Triple Rock. We know people still return to 22-year-old but timeless Loveless, and it'll be a while before it's established that Savages' brilliant debut, Silence Yourself, has that sort of staying power. It's true that MBV's show will set you back $35. (Savages' show is half the price.) The diehards will argue this is a small price to pay to see a truly groundbreaking band -- even if they're past the peak of their musical powers.  Attending both shows is a chance to bridge the influences of the past and the immediacy of music present -- assuming the next point holds up.

Will Roy Wilkins Auditorium swallow the MBV sound?

Out of all the discussions and concerns about MBV's return to the Twin Cities, this is the one that is most pressing and ultimately could help determine whether the show is a memorable one or ends up being a disaster. While plenty of bands have managed to overcome the spacious surroundings and put on amazing shows in the glorified gymnasium -- Nirvana, the White Stripes, Arcade Fire, to name a few -- more often than not the Roy has had a negative effect on the show itself, creating an echoey, muddy sound that frustrates bands and fans alike, while creating a distance between the audience and the performers that prevents a bond between the two from ever forming.

And for a band like MBV, who create an epic, textured soundscape within their music, those intricate layers might get lost within the expansive Roy. Hopefully MBV's sound guy finds the sweet spot for their mix. It would be tragic to end a 20-year wait to see MBV play live if the show gets ruined by bad sound, and Bilinda Butcher's exquisite vocals get lost in the din.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
12 comments
djwest67
djwest67

Step aside? Do you see the Rolling Stones or Oasis "stepping aside" to make room for new bands? This article is stupid and ignorant as hell.

hoffm83n
hoffm83n

I saw mbv in denver. YES YES YES it is worth it. i wore earplugs and was fine the next day even though they went over 110db

omnipitous
omnipitous

I've seen numerous shows at the Roy lately and it is very possible to make it sound fantastic in there.  You need to bring the right PA.  You need to hang it right and you need to mix it right BUT, presuming you have the budget for that first part, if your engineer can't handle parts 2 and 3 then fire him and hire someone actually capable of doing their job!

I will say I never want to be in the balcony there (I'm a sweet spot or rail rider floor type) BUT it can even sound good up there.  If it sounds like crap don't blame the building, blame the engineer (or the band if they're having an off night).  OR don't listen to me and avoid the Roy so it's easier for me to get tickets to my fav show there :-)

DavidFoureyes
DavidFoureyes topcommenter

It should be odd...They're playing at the Roy, a venue whose acoustics makes anyone playing there sound like a wall of rudderless droning noise. Interested to see how a band whose stock in trade is that sound sounds.

Derek Kosky
Derek Kosky

seen them years ago, they sounded crap then. they're a band that sound better on their albums.

peeve
peeve

yes. it's absolutely worth it. i saw them in denver a few weeks ago and it was a completely stellar show. just wear earplugs, hurrrrrrrr

Michael Mayket
Michael Mayket

There were questions answered in there somewhere?

Eric Shawn Smith
Eric Shawn Smith

Someone brought up Ride in a MBV article? NOOOO WAYYYYYY!!!!!

emteem
emteem

Wait a second... you're telling me there is a band and some people like that band while others do not? Also, some people think similar bands are better, and/or there are some people who like said bands new stuff while some people think it doesn't measure up to their old stuff? Tell me more!

EarplugLoverKen
EarplugLoverKen

Just bring earplugs man, they haven't toured since 1991 and you'd rather see Savages!? Boring derivative post-punk-revival-revival?

Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...