Why do jam bands have such a stigma?

011414_jam-band.jpg

Jam. Band. Apart, these two words are innocuous. Put them together, though, and for whatever reason, they become instantly polarizing. Whenever the subject of jam bands comes up, it seems to send some people into a frenzy of dogmatic snideness. In some cases, you get the sense that they'd almost rather you say their favorite band sucks than label it as a jam band. So why the stigma? Well, to answer that, we've probably got to go back to beginning.

See also: The ten biggest jam-band scene stereotypes


The Grateful Dead created the sound and were essentially the architects of the scene, and when Jerry Garcia died, in 1995, a huge group of people were left wondering what was next. As a result, many bands gained new fans looking for other free-feeling live-music experiences, and by the end of the '90s, many jam bands were at the top of their game.

Bands like Phish, which had grown big enough to be playing large summer sheds, and groups like the Dave Matthews Band and Blues Traveler, which had tons of radio hits and went on huge tours of their own. Bell-bottoms and '70s fashions also enjoyed a resurgence, and kids all over the country were rocking hemp chokers and Birkenstocks, wishing they were older so they could have seen the Dead in their heyday. It was actually cool to listen to jam bands for a minute there.

Fast-forward about a decade, and some jam bands have incorporated electronic music into their sound, staying up to date with what's going on in the music scene as a whole. Many have coined the sound as "jamtronica," a term meant to hold allegiance with the jam scene but nodding to the fact that it's something a little different now.

As more electronic-music listeners and a younger generation began listening to these jamtronica acts, there was a noticeable difference in the way the fans dressed. Neon dominated the apparel, along with anything else that lit up; the guy in patchwork pants and tie-dye now looked dated and corny at his own party.

But somewhere along the way, it was more than the look that began to be shunned; it was the whole jam-band scene that was being smirked at. People who saw Dave back in the day now laughed at the people who seemingly hadn't grown, who were still chasing the dream. The words "jam band" instantly evoked bad hippie clothes and other cringe-inducing things about the culture that should've been left in the past.

The problem with this sort of thinking is that the jam-band scene did evolve, and it's still bustling. There is no shortage of talented musicians who prefer to improvise on stage as they blend genres and take the audience and themselves on a total sensory experience. If you looked at a picture of the guys from Lotus, for instance, you would see that they dress more like a band from Brooklyn than a band from Woodstock.


My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
Karen Thomas
Karen Thomas

add allman bros and the dead to that list.

David Kay
David Kay

Focus on the musicians. These are the drivers behind "jam bands". It's a big world, hipsters.

Adam Mikelson
Adam Mikelson

Most people like predictable music they've heard before.

Christian Johnson
Christian Johnson

Probably the hippy dippy aspect. I once met a gal who would do some sort of genuflection after each hit of weed, and then proceeded to tell me all about crystals and their 'power'. Holy crap, really? I LOVE the Grateful Dead but in a nostalgic, baseball fan sort of way.

Jim McFarlane
Jim McFarlane

Meh. Not a fan of the genre nor of lukewarm defenses of it.

Scoops
Scoops

In part you can blame South Park. I love the show, but they really made it "cool" to hate on hippies and jam bands. Clothes, synths and the instruments will change but the audience for improvised music will probably always be there. Maybe not as big as phish got in the late 90's, but it will be there! 


Now Trending

Minnesota Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...