« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Minnesotans, especially DFL'ers, have been busy patting themselves on the back for the huge turnout at last night's caucuses. According to the Secretary of State's office, more than 200,000 Democrats cast presidential ballots, while the Republicans drew in excess of 60,000 primary voters. Participation rates for both parties broke records. On the DFL side, turnout nearly tripled the previous high-water mark. Caucuses throughout the state reported long lines, traffic jams, and a shortage of ballots. Pretty impressive stuff--and profound evidence that beltway blowhards like David Broder are full of beans when they whine that the compressed primary schedule is harming Democracy.
But let's examine those caucus numbers more closely. As of 2006, there were 3,118,515 registered voters in the state of Minnesota. In other words, roughly 8 percent of folks who had gone through the bother of registering to vote actually participated in the presidential primary last night. The numbers are even more pathetic when you consider eligible voters. There were 3,727,000 such folks as of 2006. Now we're down below 7 percent of eligible Minnesota citizens registering their preference in the presidential primary.
That's not impressive. It's a travesty.
But this isn't a knock on Minnesotans and their proud history of political engagement. The evidence is overwhelming that when presented with a rational system for voting, they'll flock to the polls. Consider recent elections. In 2006, with no presidential contest on the ballot, 2.2 million Minnesotans voted--roughly 60 percent of the electorate. Two years earlier, with John Kerry facing off against President Bush, a whopping 78 percent of eligible Minnesotans made it to the polls. In fact the percentage of voters showing up for a general election hasn't dipped below sixty percent since 1994.
So why the abysmal turnout yesterday, despite the most intriguing, tightly contested presidential primary contest in decades? Clearly the answer is the caucus system, whereby voters are forced to show up at a specific time to indicate their preference for president. Many people can't show up because they're working. Others can't find babysitters. Some may have been waylaid by a demon case of the runs. There's plenty of valid reasons why folks couldn't make it out last night.
To make matters worse, Minnesotans don't actually caucus for the presidential primary. They're not required to gather in tribal circles and publicly declare their allegiance to Mike Gravel (or whomever) as is the case in Iowa. You simply fill out a ballot indicating your preference and call it a night.
So what is the justification for this confusing, un-democratic, inefficient caucus process that disenfranchises thousands of potential voters every four years? Beats the hell out of me.
Posted by Paul Demko at February 6, 2008 4:37 PM
« McCain inspires "suicide voters" | Main | Mitt Romney calls it quits »
why should I, an independent, pay the costs for a primary with my tax dollars? The parties should be allowed to establish their own nominating process. It doesn't have to be a democracy. The purpose is for the party to put forward who should go on the november general election ballot...
Posted by: mrmaximoto at February 8, 2008 10:19 AM
Yes, the parties should be allowed to run their nominating process any damn way they please. We can't force them to give up the caucus. This is an articulate explanation of why the system sucks. It is the culmination of disinfanchisement of the people (who are party members). Both the poor and the rest are screwed by the system, which no longer (if ever) has any social relevance. Flipping burgers & want a candidate with an interest in worker safety? Too bad. Cleaning toilets and want to increase minimum wage? Too bad. Working in the ER and want someone to change the AMT? Screw you, too!
But, as mentioned by Mrmaximoto - we can't abolish it, but we can lobby for eliminating it ... if we can ever get to the caucus to put it on the agenda.
Posted by: GopherMPH at February 11, 2008 10:58 PM
Yeah, the caucus system is kind of stupid. But seriously: do you really believe that 92% of voters were unable to show up at 7 p.m. on a Tuesday? I can guarantee you that not all of them were working late. As for the babysitter issue, kids are not banned from caucuses. I brought all three of mine with me, and for my oldest, who is five, it may even have been slightly educational. The system sucks, but so do the voters, who apparently value their reality-TV time more than democracy.
Posted by: katenothing at February 15, 2008 1:41 PM
Caucuses are a joke. At the end of the day, 8% of the total democratic registered voters determine the presidential candidate in Minnesota, that is unnacceptable.
Posted by: Alessandro Machi at March 27, 2008 4:17 PM